|
January
2006 Newsletter
Issue One, Volume Seven
VOODOO ECONOMICS
By Mike Gasior
For whatever reason, in the past month or so I've
gotten a multitude of emails with questions about things where I
was surprised they were being asked by people that I would expect
to "know better". Having spent pretty much my entire adult
life around economics, finance and the investment markets, I've
become accustomed to statistics being used (mangled actually) to
prove any possible outcome and prediction. What one must keep in
mind is that there is no such thing as "bad news" for
Wall Street. All news is good news because it might cause the customers
of a brokerage firm or investment bank to act. And when customers
act, commissions and fees roll in. Data mining is the primary technique
used by brokers and there is no theory that cannot ultimately be
supported with statistics. History has proven, however, that statistics
will almost always confess if tortured sufficiently. I have decided
to spend the next couple of months dismissing some of my favorite
economic myths, thus the title of, "Voodoo Economics".
But first a wee bit of housekeeping.
WEBSITE UPDATES AND IMPROVEMENTS
I am proud to announce that we are now able to
process registrations for all our sessions on the website with the
ability of using credit cards. Also, if you'd prefer to submit an
invoice for payment by check, you will immediately receive one via
email after registering online. It's our hope to make the entire
process more streamlined and easier than ever. Should you prefer,
you can also still call us at (860)347-6568 and we will sign you
up via the phone. You can start the process by viewing the 2006
schedule at the following link:
http://www.afs-seminars.com/schedule.html
We have gotten many emails asking when the glossary
would be operation again and it is now ready for prime time once
more. You should bookmark this page and use it as the wonderful
resource of information that it is for getting definitions for financial
industry terms and acronyms. It has been completely and totally
revamped for 2006 and as far as I am concerned, it is the finest
glossary of its kind available on the Internet. Visit the glossary
at this link:
http://www.afs-seminars.com/glossary.html
There are also three very popular programs to be
held in New York during March should you or colleagues like to attend.
They are:
Introduction To Securities & Markets
--March 13, 14 & 15, 2006
http://www.afs-seminars.com/introsec.html
Swaps & Swap Derivatives
--March 16, 2006
http://www.afs-seminars.com/swap.html
Sarbanes-Oxley for Investment Departments
--March 20 & 21, 2006
http://www.afs-seminars.com/sarbanes-oxley.html
So please give the site a visit. I hope to see
many of you in person this year.
THE FIRST VIDEO COMMENTARY OF 2006 IS UP
I have decided to keep up the theme of last year
where I dedicate the video commentary to specific investment topics.
The subject matter for my January 2006 video is to give viewers
an introductory understanding of Mortgage Backed Securities. My
goal was to not only break the ice of the MBS markets, but to also
prepare everyone for next month when we will move into the topic
of CMO's (Collateralized Mortgage Obligations) and other "structured"
securities. Please view this month's and all past video clips at
the following link:
http://www.afs-seminars.com/v-commentary.html
FAN MAIL
One last thing before I start knocking off the
economic myths, and that is to share with you a little reader mail
that showed up after my year-end newsletter. Now please understand
that I was a pretty serious athlete as a child and younger man,
and have spent the past 17 years as a public speaker, and am now
going on seven years of writing this newsletter. One quickly learns
when you place yourself in front of people to make your living that
you'd better not have thin skin or a delicate psyche, or you'll
soon be sitting in a corner rocking back and forth and shaking like
a third-world child whose never been held. What I do isn't for everyone,
but like anyone who holds themselves out for public consumption
(actors, athletes, artists and seminar guys) there will always be
that particular someone who goes just a tad bit too far, which brings
me to me sharing this particular "fan mail" with you.
The note below was sent to me by a gentleman by
the name of Ken who is a vice president of something-or-other at
an investment services company in Bermuda (a client of mine actually).
I mention this for my friends in Bermuda who may know Ken and who
should immediately recognize his pompous, gasbag traits that are
beautifully displayed in this condescending email, but I'll let
you read it for yourself.
------------------------------------------------
Mike,
I normally don't send in "letters to the Editor"
but I feel compelled given the less than reasonable 2005 Predictions
review included in your December newsletter.
Please let me provide a simple, objective assessment
of your 2005 prediction results -
PREDICTION - Dow Jones - Unchanged at, or below
10,500. Definitely not higher.
RESULTS - Dow Jones - 10,717.50
FAIL
PREDICTION - NASDAQ - Unchanged at, or below 2,175.
Definitely not higher.
RESULTS - NASDAQ - 2,205.32
FAIL
PREDICTION - Ten-Year Treasury Note - Unchanged
at 4.25%% or lower. Not higher.
RESULTS - Ten-Year Treasury Note - 4.39%
FAIL
PREDICTION - Fed Funds Rate - 2.75% with the Fed
tightening two more times in 2005.
RESULTS - Fed Funds Rate - 4.25% with the Fed tightening eight more
times in 2005.
FAIL
PREDICTION - Yield Curve - Becoming even more flat.
RESULTS - Yield Curve - Almost tabletop flat, bordering on an inversion
any moment.
PASS
PREDICTION - 30-Year Mortgage Rates - 5.50% or
below. Definitely not higher.
RESULTS - 30-Year Mortgage Rates - 5.70%.
FAIL
PREDICTION - The Economy - Slowing gradually with
no more than 3.0% to 3.25% growth.
RESULTS - The Economy - It appears the 2005 number will show about
3.5% growth.
FAIL
PREDICTION - Real Estate - Both commercial and
residential real estate experiencing continued softening with potential
for melting down.
RESULTS - Real Estate - Both segments softening but still no sign
of a meltdown.
PASS ? - I'll give you PASS here but I think overall there has been
upward momentum through 2005 albeit not to the same extent as 2004.
I maybe should have FAILED you here?!.
PREDICTION - Oil Prices - Should drop to the $35
per barrel range.
RESULTS - Oil Prices - Price in the $60 per barrel range.
FAIL
PREDICTION - U.S. Unemployment - Largely unchanged
at 5.5%.
RESULT - U.S. Unemployment - Somewhat lower at 5.00%.
FAIL
PREDICTION - U.S. Inflation - Low, with no more
than 2.0% CPI.
RESULTS - U.S. Inflation - Still low, at about 2.4% CPI and rising.
FAIL
Mike - Come clean for goodness sake. Two out of
twelve - You were way way way way off with your 2005 predictions.
I still enjoy the newsletter though.
Regards,
ken
------------------------------------------------
Well I'm sure glad he still enjoys the newsletter
though.
Don't get me wrong. I think everyone is entitled
to have their own opinions, and I don't even mind people writing
to me expressing them, and it happens all the time. It just becomes
way, way, way, way too difficult for me to avoid rising to the bait
when someone exhibits the amazing set of brass b***s that my friend
Ken does by grading me as if I'm some sort third grade student of
his.
If you truly seek to pee in the tall grass with
the big dogs, be sure to include evidence of where your fabulous
predictions appeared in some substantial publication or was emailed
to over 300,000 people globally. Then you can write me a snotty
email like the one above. And I'll move to somewhere with shorter
grass with the other cowards and losers.
ECONOMIC MYTH #1 - TRAFFIC JAMS ARE CAUSED
BY OUR EXPLODING POPULATION
Fact: The traffic jams where many of us find ourselves
stuck everyday are due to the cost of driving being far too cheap.
If you want to decrease traffic we have to start making driving
more expensive, especially at peak driving times.
As much as common sense would dictate that the
current traffic situation could be explained by population growth,
and thus more cars on the road, the truth is that this is a very
straightforward economic situation. One of the most basic tenets
of economics is that if you underprice something relative to its
true cost, people will use too much of it.
Some of you might remember that a few years ago
Red Lobster ran a special where for $20 you could eat as much crab
as you could eat, or until they closed the restaurant. It was named
the "endless crab promotion".
Well Red Lobster lost buckets of money and their
president got fired. During a conference call with Wall Street analysts,
the chairman and new president actually engaged the analysts in
a cerebral conversation about whether it was the third or fourth
helping of crab that busted them. No kidding.
Basically our whole transportation system is set
up almost exactly like the Red Lobster promotion and it is failing
pretty badly too.
The best analogy I ever heard to compare this to
is if we were to operate our public golf courses just like we operate
our public roads. First we would charge all taxpayers to help build
and operate the golf courses, regardless of whether or not or how
often they played golf. Then, we charge very little, or better still
nothing at all, to play and anyone can tee off any time they showed
up at the course. I would surmise to predict (although I don't know
if Ken would agree with me) that you'd likely have hundreds of people
on the first tee on Sunday mornings at 8:00 a.m. ready to fire away.
Without doubt the media would soon be reporting the latest violence
to erupt in our ever-deteriorating society, "golf rage".
Luckily, golf courses have a decent grasp on economics
and charge the highest prices at the most desirable times, and offer
discounted fees during the "off peak" periods.
Many of you already know I'm against most taxes
or government fees of any type, but there is currently no reason
for me to not drive my Hummer 65 miles each way between work and
my 6,000 square foot McMansion out in the boonies. Luckily all the
other people who don't drive as much as me are helping to subsidize
my lifestyle. (Please understand that while I do live in the boonies,
I don't drive a Hummer or technically have a job. I was just painting
a picture in your head of someone you likely know.) There are certainly
plenty of toll roads throughout the U.S., but modern technology
can revolutionize the collection of tolls as well as alter the pricing
at different times of the day. Economists and traffic engineers
refer to this as "congestion pricing". In most locations
there is some version of "EZ Pass" or "Speed Pass"
where you buzz through the booth at moderate speed and the toll
is simply deducted electronically from your balance.
One other idea is what is already happening in
San Diego on the I-15 FastTrak. This freeway does have actual free
lanes, but also "HOT" lanes (High Occupancy/Toll) lanes
that run parallel to the free ones. Carpoolers are welcome to use
the HOT or free lanes at anytime, and people willing to pay the
toll can use them also. The toll varies from $.50 to $4.00 depending
upon TRAFFIC CONDITIONS. Pretty cool, huh? There are digital signs
along the road that flash the current toll at any moment and the
cost will vary as the HOT lane gets more congested.
The downside (and some of you were already thinking
of this) is that people will think this is some swipe at poorer
citizens, or an attempt to give rich people their own lane on the
freeway. The HOT lanes are referred to as the "Lexus lanes"
out there already.
But consider the painter making $14 an hour who
is looking like they may be 30 minutes late for work. Well they're
going to get docked $7 if they don't spring for the four bucks.
You can do the arithmetic. Besides, lower level workers get fired
or fined if they show up late for work or to pick up the kids from
daycare. CEO's don't.
Yet another upside of making peak driving more
expensive is that employers and employees may work to implement
a more diverse and flexible work schedule, which could benefit many
workers. Plus, anything that reduces our appetite for an increasingly
expensive commodity like oil can't hurt either.
The Federal gas tax is not indexed to inflation
and has been dropping in inflation adjusted terms for over a decade
now. If politicians could be trusted at all (they can't be) they
could start by increasing the Federal gas tax of 18.4 cents to discourage
something like driving too much, and use that revenue to reduce
taxes on something we'd like to encourage like working or saving.
Needless to say, that won't ever happen.
I know this whole conversation has probably gone
over like a ton of bricks with few people liking the idea at all.
But it would work.
ECONOMIC MYTH #2 - THE COST OF LIVING HAS
RISEN STEADILY DURING THE 20TH CENTURY AND HAS GOTTEN EVEN WORSE
IN THE PAST FEW DECADES
This one people tend to bite into hook, line and
sinker, but it's almost completely untrue. On the surface it certainly
appears that the price of almost everything you look at is more
expensive then you remember, so it follows that the cost of living
must be higher then it has ever been.
But a much more practical and applicable way to
measure the true cost of anything is to consider how long an average
worker has to work to pay for a variety of life's expenses. Too
often people focus strictly on the expense side of their life's
balance sheet without considering the earnings side. Let me do it
for you right here.
These are the amounts of time an average worker
has to labor to afford the following items:
Half Gallon of Milk
1920 - 37 minutes
1950 - 16 minutes
1980 - 12 minutes
2006 - 6.5 minutes
One Pound Loaf of Bread
1920 - 13 minutes
1950 - 7 minutes
1980 - 5 minutes
2006 - 4 minutes
One Gallon of Gasoline
1920 - 32 minutes
1950 - 11 minutes
1980 - 10 minutes
2006 - 7 minutes
100 Mile of Air Travel
1920 - 12 hours and 46 minutes (This is actually 1930. Public air
travel not available in 1920.)
1950 - 4 hours and 7 minutes
1980 - 1 hour and 27 minutes
2006 - 57 minutes
Three Minutes of Coast-to-Coast Long Distance Phone
Call
1920 - 30 hours and 3 minutes
1950 - 1 hour and 44 minutes
1980 - 11 minutes
2006 - 7 seconds
Pair of Levis
1920 - 10 hours and 36 minutes
1950 - 4 hours
1980 - 2 hours and 48 minutes
2006 - 1 hour and 55 minutes
Three Pounds of Chicken
1920 - 2 hours and 27 minutes
1950 - 1 hour and 11 minutes
1980 - 18 minutes
2006 - 13 minutes
100 Kilowatts of Electricity
1920 - 13 hours and 36 minutes
1950 - 2 hours
1980 - 45 minutes
2006 - 37 minutes
Computing Power of 1 MIPS
1920 - n/a
1950 - 515,000 lifetimes
1980 - 41 weeks 16 hours and 9 minutes
2006 - 7 minutes
This continuous cheapening is thanks to years and
years of research and development as well as constant increases
in efficiency and productivity. Never mind the fact that the universe
of products and services available to enjoy with your money has
grown enormously during the previous 90 years too. This could be
something that contributes to the feeling by many people that life
is much more expensive today then ever before. But keep in mind
that even your parents probably didn't worry about the cable TV,
cell phone, Internet access, daycare and Starbucks bills as part
of their "cost of living" like you might.
NEXT MONTH
I plan to keep up with these economic myths next
month too and try to answer whether illegal and legal immigrants
really are stealing jobs from hard working Americans. We'll also
look into whether or not the Federal Reserve really had JFK assassinated
back in 1963 along with a few other surprises.
TWO REALLY TERRIFIC BOOKS
The first book I'd really like to recommend is
one that I bought at O'Hare late last year after I'd had a flight
get delayed, and just finished over the holiday season.
The book is titled "Freakonomics" and
was written by Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner. Mr. Levitt is a
professor of economics at the University of Chicago and was awarded
the John Bates Clark Medal not long ago, which is awarded every
two years to the best American economist under forty.
I'll confess that I'd heard the title of the book,
but honestly had no idea what topics were tackled in it. All I have
to tell you is that there is a chapter called "How is the Klu
Klux Klan Like a Group of Real Estate Agents" to explain what
the tone of the book is throughout. And by the way, the minute you
finish reading that chapter you will agree that real estate agents
and the Klu Klux Klan are exactly the same in certain regards.
The second book is just recently published and
titled "Strapped" authored by Tamara Draut. I had seen
a rash of news articles referencing some of the things Ms. Draut
had written in her book, and I'd found an excerpt that I read that
I'd found fascinating.
Her subject is how America's 20 and 30-somethings
just can't seem to get ahead economically due to a host of factors.
These range from being unable to afford to go to college at all
and getting stuck in low paying jobs, or going to college and graduating
with thousands and thousands of dollars of debt afterward. She also
focuses on the trend in recent years of the credit card companies
recruiting college students to apply for cards, and how this easy
credit often saddles these young people with onerous loads of debt.
I mentioned last month that I've been working on
a very large consulting project, and it has had me living in Boston
for the most part since last December. I was surprised a week ago
to walk into my hotel and find Ms. Draut right there in the lobby
bar promoting her book and chatting with people. I introduced myself
and had the chance to chat with her for a bit and congratulate her
on covering a subject that I'd been hearing a lot about myself from
the younger people who attend my seminars. I have just begun the
book, but I can already tell you that it will give readers of all
ages and situations important insights into the "Strapped"
condition many of this generation find themselves in.
Tamara endorsed my copy of the book by writing
"Mike. Thanks for your support." It is an important book
for people to read, and I most certainly support everyone to give
it a try.
YOUR JANUARY BRAINTEASER
The only advice I have for you this month is to
try and not over think this one. That was the mistake I made when
I first tried it and then I kicked myself for missing one that could
have been easy. See what you think:
"I have five letters and five addressed envelopes.
If I place the letters in the envelopes at random, what are the
chances that only four letters are in their correct envelopes?"
Good luck, and when you finally surrender you will
find the answer at the following link:
http://www.afs-seminars.com/brainteaser_Jan2006.html
The answer to last month's brainteaser was listed
on the website as the following:
"The only vowel they contain, when written
as words, is E."
Many of you did write me to let me know that the
number 17 would also qualify, and those of you who brought this
to my attention were totally correct. Others tried to argue that
there were also numbers that contained the vowel E as well as Y
and wondered if those should be included too, but I pulled out my
whistle and striped shirt and ruled that the letter Y in those cases
was not being used as a vowel. Good try though.
Copyright 2006, Michael Gasior. All Rights Reserved
http://www.afs-seminars.com
Copyright 2006, Michael Gasior. All Rights Reserved.
PREVIOUS | NEXT

|