|
March
2005 Newsletter
Issue Three, Volume Six
REAL ESTATE IS OVER
By Mike Gasior
This month's edition may actually take on characteristics
more common to a newspaper than a newsletter. My feeling is that
we have reached a very substantial crossroad in several markets
and that a long-term cycle is currently ending and a new one will
soon be underway. I have to honestly admit that I cannot remember
a time anywhere in the recent past where I felt so compelled to
address so many different topics. The financial markets and economy
have spent several years in a fairly boring trough with no substantive
or major changes in trend, but I now feel that huge changes have
begun on many fronts. Very big things are already underway.
APRIL VIDEO CLIP IS UP
This month my video commentary is dedicated to
my final two equity-based topics of rights and warrants. I try to
explain simply what the two securities are, and why corporations
issue them, even getting into a discussion about how warrants can
be used as an "equity kicker" on a debt issuance. At the
end of the conversation I also share with you a lesson taught to
me by an old-timer when I first got into the business about spotting
major trends without being distracted by the daily noise. This lesson
is particularly valuable in better understanding the reasoning behind
my change of viewpoint on several fronts this month.
You can view both high-speed and low-speed versions
of the clip by visiting the homepage at the following link:
http://www.afs-seminars.com
GRAND CAYMAN HEDGE FUND SESSION
The Grand Cayman "Providing Services to the
Hedge Fund Industry" is definitely being held at the Hyatt
Regency Grand Cayman Resort at the beachfront portion of their property
on May 18th, 19th and 20th. Attendance is already extremely heavy
but there might be some limited availability if you would like to
attend. Please call our offices at (860)347-6568 to inquire, or
you can reach by email.
Information on the session can be viewed at:
http://www.afs-seminars.com/cayman.html
Without wasting anymore time prefacing the subjects,
let me begin to address each one in a direct and to-the-point type
of manner.
REAL ESTATE IS OVER
While I am almost always loath to make anything
other than macro predictions about most aspects of the economy at
large, or particular asset classes, all I can tell you is I feel
amazingly comfortable in telling you that the boom in residential
real estate values is over. With a fair degree of confidence I predict
that we have seen the top of U.S. housing values and that prices
will begin a long a cyclical decline. I have not felt similar confidence
since 1999 when I wrote in this letter that I believed that the
NASDAQ had peaked on the day it crossed through 5,000.
What makes me so extremely confident is the message
that is being sent by the Federal Reserve, in what I find to be
surprisingly blunt language, is that among the reasons for steady
rate increases by the Fed they cite the "pricing power"
being exhibited by home builders. The Federal Reserve is keenly
aware of the price bubble they created in real estate due to the
reductions in rates that was absolutely necessary back in 2001 and
2002 to avoid a quite serious recession at that time. Now I believe
they have decided to end it and you can be sure the Fed will win
this battle because they ALWAYS do. Should the housing market somehow
show any resiliency through the rate increases we've already seen
and the promised ones coming in the future (and I don't believe
that it will be resilient at all) the Fed will most certainly continue
on course until the real estate market's back is broken. This I
can guarantee you.
How much the overall value of residential real
estate will decline is dependent upon the region the property is
located in as well as changes in the economy that are difficult
to precisely predict at this point. Based on some cursory research
and modeling I have performed in the past few days I will share
my viewpoint on the real estate market at various mortgage interest
rate levels:
30-YEAR FIXED RATE REACHES 6.00% - At this rate
level, inventories of housing will begin to expand rapidly. There
will be a rush of sellers trying hard to get out of their current
homes and the recent rash of speculators in many markets will exasperate
the situation. With so many people rushing the doors at once, a
sudden glut of "For Sale" signs immediately emboldens
buyers who have been waiting for things to turn their way. Based
on my statistics, for every 100 homebuyers that could have qualified
for a mortgage at 5.25%, that buying pool is immediately shrunk
to 85 buyers with the 30-year rate at 6.00%. Real estate values
will need to decline by 5% to get the pool back to 100.
30-YEAR FIXED RATE REACHES 6.50% - Based on my
statistics, the pool of buyers that can now qualify for a mortgage
at 6.50% has shrunk again to 68 buyers. Real estate prices will
need to decline almost 12% from current levels for the pool to return
to 100 potential buyers who could have afforded the home with a
5.25% mortgage.
30-YEAR FIXED RATE REACHES 7.00% - Now the pool
of buyers has slid below fifty to 46 potential buyers with the mortgage
rate at 7.00%. Suddenly housing values need to decline almost 22%
from current levels to get the pool of potential buyers back to
100.
30 YEAR FIXED RATE REACHES 7.50% - This is the
level where a "doomsday" scenario for real estate begins
in many regions of the country that have experienced the largest
increases in the previous 5 years. Our fictitious pool of 100 buyers
who could have afforded housing with a 5.25% mortgage has now been
reduced to 28 people. At this point, values would have to decline
by almost 35% from current levels to get our buying pool back to
100.
30-YEAR FIXED RATE RISES ABOVE 8.00% - At this
point the market will need to give back nearly all the gains enjoyed
between 1999 and 2005 in order to stabilize the marketplace. The
decline that would result would be more severe that the one experienced
in the Northeast and Southern California between 1989 and 1994 when
homes depreciated between 20% to 25% in those markets and condo
prices dropped between 40% and 60%. No region of the U.S. would
be immune although each area could look to 1999 market values for
an idea where their respective bottom might be.
If you are curious what may make interest rates
rise simply read on to the next line.
THE BOND MARKET IS OVER TOO
I was one of the few people in the world who maintained
a low interest viewpoint for the economy all the way through 2004
and so far into 2005, but the time is now over for me to keep that
stance. The very long-term trend of low interest rates is over and
we will now enter an extended cycle of slowly and steadily increasing
rates.
For the purposes of full disclosure (not that I
feel that this is necessarily anybody's business than mine) I have
completely liquidated all bond holdings in my taxable accounts.
I continue to be heavily invested in bonds in my retirement accounts
and I cannot foresee that situation changing. I also want to remind
my readers that none of what I am saying in this newsletter should
be construed as investment advice, and should you find yourself
making decisions based on my opinions, please do me a favor and
lose my email address and phone number. I don't want to hear about
it.
Some of my rationales for my change of viewpoint
are as follows:
THE FISCAL SITUATION IN THE INDUSTRIALIZED
COUNTRIES
Just over a week ago, the rating agency Standard
& Poors confirmed what I have been telling my readers for a
very long time, which is that the massive and looming liability
of an aging population will be devastating to all the major industrialized
nations. Many people would never be able to conceive that the debt
issued by the U.S., U.K., Japan, Germany or France could ever be
considered "Junk Bonds", but consider these facts released
by S&P:
JAPAN - Their debt is already "junk"
rated and it is estimated that their debt will reach 700% of their
GDP by the year 2050. That is the equivalent of a person earning
$50,000 a year being $350,000 in debt. Maybe that person will be
able to repay that debt. Maybe they won't.
FRANCE - Their debt should reach "junk"
status by the year 2023 and their debt reaches 235% of their GDP
in 2050.
UNITED STATES - Uncle Sam's rating will reach "junk"
level by 2026 and debt levels will surpass 239% of GDP by 2050.
For some perspective, the debt of the United States Government is
currently only 65% of their GDP.
GERMANY - The Germans will pull into the "junk
bond" garage right before New Years Eve 2030 while their debt
grows to 221% of GDP in 2005 compared to the 68% level it is at
today.
UNITED KINGDOM - Perhaps feeling somewhat left
out of this pity party, England will join everyone else in the "losers
lounge" right before 2035 when their bonds drop below "investment
grade" and their debt level rises to 160% of GDP in 2050 versus
only 42% today.
ITALY - Our Italian friends have already suffered
some ugly financial problems during the past 10 years and their
debt is already 104% of their GDP. I felt compelled to mention them
since they deserve a gold star for being the only major country
who should actually see their debt level SHRINK by 2050 to 91% of
GDP.
The other factors that are unavoidable that will
also cause a rather long and cyclical increase in interest rates
are:
--Credit related spreads on many corporate, municipal
and asset related products have already started to swell from the
nearly historic lows recently reached. This simply means that in
the recent past lenders (bond investors) have been accepting very
little "extra" return for lending to entities that present
more credit risk than U.S. Treasury offerings. With the potential
credit downgrading of many corporate and municipal offerings, along
with the extending duration of lots of mortgage and asset backed
securities, investors will quickly demand higher returns to compensate
them for the increased risk. This will drive the prices of these
products down and interest rates upward.
--Oil prices will not go down in any significant
way for what is likely to be a very long time. As much as I have
been trying to warn readers that it was inevitable that oil would
spike in the near future, even my jaw dropped last week when Goldman
Sachs raised their upper limit on oil to $105 per barrel. The prospect
of oil prices being quoted in triple digits was and will be an enormously
sobering thing for many investors and industries. This, along with
other commodity inflation will contribute to driving rates higher
and higher. As the cost of manufacturing, travel and nearly everything
else begins to price in these increased costs, bond investors will
demand to be compensated to keep them ahead of this inflation.
--The possibility of an unexpected financial disaster
that is impossible to predict with any pinpoint accuracy increases
on a daily basis as interest rates rise. It has always been the
historic case that environments like we are currently experiencing
tend to hatch economic explosions in one segment of the marketplace
or another without fail, and this is true going back to well before
the 1929 stock market crash. If forced to make any particular prediction,
I suspect we will witness the failure of a fairly major financial
institution due to a position in mortgage related products or an
un-hedged, or inadequately hedged position in credit default derivatives.
Remember who warned you about this and watch the dampening effect
it will have on a wide variety of markets.
STOCKS WILL LANGUISH
The headline says enough, but the facts remain
that overall U.S. stock values remain too high by historic standards.
While I feel that valuations are by no means horrifying, my belief
is that the stock market will become a surprisingly volatile whipping
boy whenever negative news filters into people's consciousness.
You can always argue that "stock pickers" can make money
in any sort of market, this will become increasingly difficult in
a market that seems to punish the good companies almost as much
as the bad. Overall, the stock market will prove to be worth avoiding
for the most part.
CASH AND COMMODITIES WILL BE KING
More than anything, try very hard not to lose money
in the coming few years.
--Don't lose money in this real estate market.
--Don't lose money in mid to long-term bonds.
--Don't lose money in this miserable stock market.
There will be very little wrong with sitting on
a pile of cash while the upcoming storm rolls through, and there
may be money to be made in commodities and the stocks of companies
in commodity businesses. I don't have any particular choices to
offer, but you get the idea. When you look back five years from
now, the prospect of having made 3% to 5% on your money by staying
liquid in cash might make you feel like you were quite the genius.
In the meantime many people will be well served to head back to
harbor and securely fasten your boat to the dock until things blow
over.
IMAGINE THIS
Everyone knows that the world's largest carmaker
is General Motors and you likely are already aware of the pressures
that GM has come under in the past few months. What you may NOT
know is that GM stock was around $90 as recently as 2000 and has
most recently been trading at about $29.50. This decline has brought
the stock market value of General Motors Corporation to about 16.6
billion dollars.
This next piece of information is the part that
is difficult to imagine, but just weeks ago Harley Davidson watched
their stock market value soar to a level that actually exceeded
GM's value by in excess of a billion dollars. Harley's stock has
since declined by about $6.00 bringing their market capitalization
to 16.4 billion dollars.
I just wanted to share this with you because I
don't think I could have ever imagined the day that would find General
Motors so out of favor that investors would find Harley Davidson
a more valuable company. More evidence to keep in the back of your
mind is that there are plenty of things that you might never imagine
happening, which managed to happen anyway. Always keep that thought
in the back of your head before being dismissive toward any future
scenario occurring that might effect an investment you are considering.
John Lennon said it best; "Life is what happens while you're
busy making plans."
A SORRY DISPLAY
I hate that fact that I actually stooped to using
my wonderful readers as unwitting participants in a social experiment,
but alas, I did precisely that last month.
I titled last month's newsletter "Mother's
Little Helper" and then deeper into the edition I made mention
how I had lifted the title from a Beatles tune. I was curious to
find out how many of my 250,000+ subscribers and Lord knows how
many thousands of others that get my newsletter forwarded to them
would point out this GREVIOUS misappropriation of one of my favorite
Rock and Roll lyrics of all time.
Well, the results are in and they were miserable.
A grand total of 14 people out of hundreds of thousands spotted
the mistake and wrote me to point it out. With the list so horribly
small, I have even decided to credit them by name. Here are the
notes I got:
Annie - I *know* you know this but..."Mother's
Little Helper" is Stones, not Beatles - am I like the 9000th
person to tell you this?! And I got the brainteaser too..I think,
haven't checked my answer yet.
Dennis - Wasn't "mother's little helper"
a stones tune, not Beatles?
Kathleen - Just read your February Newsletter and
I enjoyed it immensely, as I always do. Your candor and insight
make for some marvelous reading. However, I must call to your attention
the fact that I believe "mother's little helper" is a
line from a Rolling Stones tune (19th Nervous Breakdown), not The
Beatles.
Michael - Great newsletter as always! Add my correction
to the hundreds you have or will receive correcting you that "Mother's
Little Helper" is a Rolling Stones tune.
Phil - I'd never knock your opinions, but the Stones
(not Beatles) are responsible for 'Mother's Little Helper'.
Charles - You of all people!! Rolling Stones not
Beatles!
Michael - Mother's little helper is the Rolling
Stones not the Beatles. I am shocked!!
Bill - Mother's Little Helper was a Stone's song.
Hey Mike. I really enjoy your newsletters. Please
keep e-mailing them to me. Your reasoning is quite accurate, as
far as I'm concerned, about most of the subjects you cover (especially
the Stupid Politician Tricks).
Joe - However, I ran across your statement in the
latest newsletter that linked the phrase "Mother's Little Helper"
to a Beatles song. I'm unfamiliar with any Beatles song that uses
that line (although I could certainly be wrong), but would suggest
that the song you actually meant to quote was by the Rolling Stones
and actually called "Mother's Little Helper." "What
a drag it is getting old..." Just thought I'd point that out.
Please feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. I won't be insulted,
I promise.
Brian - Re: the following quote from your newsletter:
"First and foremost, let me cop to lifting the "mother's
little helper" line from a Beatles tune." FYI, the line
is from a Rolling Stones song (of the same name), not Beatles. Thought
you'd want to know. Keep the good stuff coming!
David - That was "The Stones", man!
Tom - First and foremost, let me cop to lifting
the "mother's little helper" line from a Beatles tune.
Don't you mean a Rolling Stones tune?
Paul - Isn't the "mother's little helper"
lyric from the Rolling Stones?
So I promise there are no hidden tests in this
edition, but I can't rule out something in the future so pay attention.
And definitely feel free to point out horrible errors like that
to me in the future.
BRAINTEASER
For a change of pace I thought I might toss a business/finance
related trivia question for you. The question actually popped into
my head this past week when I spent a decent amount of time talking
about the person who is part of the answer on several occasions
during my seminars. There will likely be only two kinds of reactions
to the question. "That was way too easy" or "How
the heck am I supposed to know that?" Now let's see which group
you fall into.
"Who holds the world record as the highest
paid EMPLOYEE in history, how much did they earn, and for extra
credit, who paid it to them and when?"
When you can't stand it anymore, just click the
following link for the answer:
http://www.afs-seminars.com/brainteaser_Mar2005.html
And the answer to LAST month's brainteaser is:
The ball in the buckets of 45 degree F water hits
the bottom of the bucket last. Did you think that the water in the
30 degree bucket is frozen? Think again...the question said nothing
about the bucket having anything in it. Therefore, there is no water
(or ice) to slow the ball down.
http://www.afs-seminars.com
Copyright 2005, Michael Gasior. All Rights Reserved.
PREVIOUS | NEXT

|